Sampson v. Civiletti’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.2d 860 · 1980
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Vinieratos v. United States, Department of the Air Force ex rel. Aldridge (1991), McGuinness v. United States Postal Service (1984)
24 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Brown v. General Services Administration · Love v. Pullman Co. · Neu v. Grant · Richerson v. Jones · Ettinger v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is also ‘particularly important that the agency develop a record and have the opportunity to exercise its discretion, to apply its expertise, and, possibly, to discover and correct its own errors.’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Exhaustion is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The agency shall extend the time limits in this section: (i) When the complainant shows that he was not notified of the time limits and was not otherwise aware of them or that he was prevented by circumstances beyond his control from submitting the matter within the time limits; or (ii) for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.