United States v. Turkette’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.2d 896 · 1980
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2007 · most notably United States v. Turkette (1981), United States v. Lane (1986)
47 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3333 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 6001
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Iannelli v. United States · Bates v. State Bar · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Castor v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are alleged to have participated in the same act or transactions or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“§ 1961 As used in this chapter— (1) “racketeering activity” means (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of Title 18, United States Code: . . . section 1952 (relating to racketeering) ..., or (D) any offense involving ... the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in narcotic or other dangerous drugs punishable under any law of the United States; ****** (4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity; (5) “pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity; * * * § 1962 (c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to .conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity .... (d) it shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this section.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“relatedness of offenses can be established by demonstrating that essentially the same facts must be shown for each of the consolidated crimes.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.