Goodwin v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.3d 301 · 2011
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. Taylor · State v. Jenks · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' "[I]n order to establish prejudice, the new evidence that a [postconviction] petitioner presents must differ in a substantial way-in strength and subject matter-from the evidence actually presented at sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saunders v. State“different from and much stronger than the evidence presented on direct appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saunders v. State“much more extensive, powerful, and corroborated,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saunders v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.