United States v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.3d 331 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Mondragon-Santiago · United States v. Conatser · United States v. Baker · United States v. Berry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“generally clear the rationale under which it has imposed the consecutive sentence ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if there is some other evidence in the record that it considered the section”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.