Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 F.3d 412 - United States v. Ewing

United States v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis

632 F.3d 412 · 2011

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on United States v. Lange · United States v. Stymiest · United States v. Vickers · Chavez v. Weber · United States v. Lockett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1)(A) all acts and omissions committed, aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, procured, or willfully caused by the defendant; that occurred during the commission of the offense of conviction, in preparation for that offense, or in the course of attempting to avoid detection or responsibility for that offense; [and] (2) solely with respect to offenses of a character for which § 3D1.2(d) would require grouping of multiple counts, all acts and omissions described in subdivisions (1)(A) and (1)(B) above that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “By failing to file objections, Ewing waived his right to de novo review [of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation on a suppression motion] by the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.