Baraket v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.3d 56 · 2011
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Jean Patrick Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Jones v. Coughlin · Company of Kingston v. Latona Trucking, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A decision of a panel of this Court is binding unless and until it is overruled by the Court en banc or by the Supreme Court.’ ”) (quoting S & R Co. of Kingston v. Latona Trucking, Inc., 159 F.3d 80 , 83 (2d Cir.1998)). We also note that Chowdhury’s amended complaint did not state a TVPA claim against WBH. See Moha-mad v. Palestinian Authority, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1702 , 1710, 182 L.Ed.2d 720 (2012) (holding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.