Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 F.3d 658 - Dronsejko v. Thornton

Dronsejko v. Thornton’s Empirical Analysis

632 F.3d 658 · 2011

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 9 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. · Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the evidence was newly discovered since the trial; (2) the moving party was diligent in discovering the new evidence; (3) the newly discovered evidence was not merely cumulative or impeaching; (4) the newly discovered evidence is material; and (5) ... a new trial with the newly discovered evidence would probably produce a different result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.