¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying relief on Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Miley, No. 6:13-cv-03516-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4• AFFIRMED,