Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 P2D 1025 - People v. Brown

People v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2025

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

15019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. CALVAREST · People v. Vinnola · People v. Saars · People v. DelGuidice · Fuhrer v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f any provision of a statute is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of the statute are valid, unless it appears to the court that the valid provisions of the statute are so essentially and inseparably connected with, and so dependent upon, the void provision that it cannot be presumed the legislature would have enacted the valid provisions without the void one; or unless the court determines that the valid provisions, standing alone, are incomplete and are incapable of being executed in accordance with the legislative intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(1) The criminal sexual assault offenses of this part 4 [unlawful sexual behavior] shall not apply to acts between persons who are married, either statutorily, putatively, or by common law. (2) The criminal sexual assault offenses of this part 4 shall apply to spouses living apart, with the intent to live apart, whether or not under a decree of judicial separation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[TJhe defendant's burden is not to persuade this Court that the [law] is unwise, but that it is totally lacking in reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.