Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 P2D 1215 - Assadollah v. State

Assadollah v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2005

5 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

130198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Morissette v. United States · Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven a failure to draw error to the attention of the court below will not result in a permanent waiver of that error when it is fundamental. See Rea v. State, 3 Okl.Cr. 281, 105 P. 386 (1909). That opinion also defined fundamental error as any error which goes to the foundation of the case or which denies the defendant a right essential to his defense. In accord, Stowe v. State, 397 P.2d 693 (Okl.Cr. 1964). When intent is an element of the crime, an instruction absolving the State of its burden to prove that element beyond a reasonable doubt is a fundamental error going to the very foundation of the case. It cannot be waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A design to effect death is inferred from the fact of killing, unless the circumstances raise a reasonable doubt whether such design existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.