Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 P2D 848 - Hall v. Warren

Hall v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Williams v. Melby (1985), Rollins v. Petersen (1991)

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions

1301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ethel Javins v. First National Realty Corporation, Rudolph Saunders v. First National Realty Corporation, Stanley Gross v. First National Realty Corporation · Steele v. Latimer · 16 Utah 2d 30 - Thompson v. Ford Motor Company · Jacobsen Construction Co. v. Structo-Lite Engineering, Inc. · Stephenson v. Warner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his obligation is in accord with the contemporary approach toward leased habitations which emphasizes the contractual nature of the relationship between landlord and tenant instead of viewing a lease simply as a demise of real estate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “subject to justification or excuse if the evidence is such that it reasonably could be found that the conduct was nevertheless within the standard of reasonable care under the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the existence of the statute or ordinance, (2) that the statute or ordinance was intended to protect the class of persons which includes the party, (3) that the protection is directed toward the type of harm which has in fact occurred as a result of the violation, and (4) that the violation of the ordinance or statute was ■ a proximate cause of the injury complained of.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.