Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 SO2D 1342 - Cooper v. State

Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte State · 566 So. 2d 758 - Ex Parte State · Nesbitt v. State · 612 So. 2d 1251 - Cooper v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Cooper v. State , 632 So.2d 1342 , 1343-44 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), aff'd, 632 So.2d 1344 (Ala. 1994) (`The record in this case shows that the appellant was not given notice, prior to the third sentencing hearing, of the convictions the state intended to prove. At the hearing, the appellant made numerous and timely objections to the failure to give notice.')."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “supply sufficient notice of the specific prior convictions upon which the state intends to rely.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.