632 So. 2d 1359 - Florida Bar v. Temmer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Absent the existence of aggravating factors, the appropriate discipline for an attorney found guilty of felonious conduct as defined by Florida State law involving the personal use and/or possession of a controlled substance who has sought and obtained assistance from F.L.A., Inc., or a treatment program approved by F.L.A., Inc., as described in paragraph one above, would be as follows: (a) A suspension from the practice of law for a period of 91 days or 90 days if rehabilitation has been proven; and (b) A three-year period of probation, subject to possible early termination or extension of said probation, with a condition that the attorney enter into a rehabilitation contract with F.L.A., Inc. prior to reinstatement.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 753 So. 2d 555 - The Florida Bar v. Temmer

2. “In light of [the] evidence and Standard 10.3(a), we find a ninety-day suspension to be the appropriate discipline in this case. Thus, we disapprove the referee's recommended discipline of a ninety-one-day suspension and proof of rehabilitation. However, we agree with the referee that a three-year probationary period is appropriate, in light of Temmer's history.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 753 So. 2d 555 - The Florida Bar v. Temmer

3. “does not appear to be sufficient evidence upon which to infer a substance abuse problem”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 753 So. 2d 555 - The Florida Bar v. Temmer