Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 SO2D 1361 - Stein v. State

Stein v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State (1999), 753 So. 2d 29 - Rodriguez v. State (2000)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

150199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Payne v. Tennessee · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Doerr v. Doerr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Additionally, a murder may be both CCP and committed to avoid arrest as long as distinct facts support each circumstance. [T]he facts supporting CCP must focus on the manner in which the crime was executed, e.g., advance procurement of weapon, lack of provocation, killing carried out as a matter of course, whereas the facts supporting the commission to avoid arrest must focus on the defendant's motivation for the crime.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]o long as each aggravator is supported by such distinct facts”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no significant history of prior criminal activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.