Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 So. 2d 224 - Ross v. Baker

632 So. 2d 224 - Ross v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2013

16 state decisions

110199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 605 So. 2d 850 - Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc. · Eller v. Shova · 348 So. 2d 3 - State v. Greene · 584 So. 2d 647 - Killingsworth v. State · Shova v. Eller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that a party is not entitled to workers' compensation immunity as a matter of law.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an issue. At least in some instances, such orders may merely establish that the trial court currently views the issue of immunity to involve unresolved factual questions as well as legal questions. Nevertheless, we conclude that the supreme court intends for this court to review this type of order. Id. at 225 (emphasis in original omitted) (emphasis added). We ultimately concluded, however, that because there was”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[N]egligence of a gross and flagrant character which evinces a reckless disregard for the safety of others. It is that entire want of care which raises a presumption of indifference to consequences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.