632 So. 2d 321 - Jarrell v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. (1994), Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc. (1997)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · Oller v. Sharp Electric, Inc. · 451 So. 2d 1235 - Oller v. Sharp Elec., Inc. · 589 So. 2d 10 - Insley v. Titan Ins. Co. · 581 So. 2d 687 - Evans v. GRAVES PONTIAC-BUICK-GMC TRUCK INC.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the amended statute, the initial burden of proof remains with the mover to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists. However, under Art. 966(C), once the mover had made a pri-ma facie showing that the motion should be granted, the burden shifts to the non-moving party to present evidence demonstrating that material factual issues remain. Once the motion for summary judgment has been properly supported by the moving party, the failure of the non-moving party to produce evidence of a material factual dispute mandates the granting of the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.