Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 So. 2d 503 - Harris v. State

632 So. 2d 503 - Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018 · most notably Harris v. Alabama (1995), Loggins v. State (2000)

1 federal appellate · 67 state decisions

400199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Irvin v. Dowd · Bumper v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of [his] trial, then we can find no error in the appellant's absence from the hearing.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ex Parte Burton · Ponder v. State
  2. “is not a factor about the defendant or the circumstances of the crime. It is instead a lingering uncertainty about facts, a state of mind that exists somewhere between”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 947 So. 2d 1079 - Harris v. State · 699 So. 2d 1281 - Myers v. State
  3. “Thus, where a juror states that he has opinions but that he would try the case fairly and impartially according to the law and the evidence and that he would not allow his opinion to influence his decision, it is not error for a trial judge to deny a challenge for cause. Howard v. State, 420 So.2d 828, 831 (Ala.Cr.App.1982). `A juror who brings his thoughts out into the open in response to voir dire questions may be the one who later”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Minor v. State · 776 So. 2d 819 - Travis v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.