Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 SO2D 53 - Ferguson v. Singletary

Ferguson v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably 759 So. 2d 650 - Thompson v. State (2000), 842 So. 2d 52 - Spencer v. State (2003)

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

240199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Addonizio · Coker v. Georgia · Riggins v. Nevada · Espinosa v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “point[ed] to no specific error which occurred”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[h]ad appellate counsel asserted error which went uncorrected because of the missing record, or had [the defendant] pointed to errors in this petition, this claim may have had merit.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “first, whether the alleged omissions are of such magnitude as to constitute a serious error or substantial deficiency falling measurably outside the range of professionally acceptable performance and, second, whether the deficiency in performance compromised the appellate process to such a degree as to undermine confidence in the correctness of the result.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.