Bank v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2001
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 547 So. 2d 925 - State v. Green · 491 So. 2d 543 - Daniels v. State · 598 So. 2d 215 - Price v. State · 611 So. 2d 600 - Thomas v. State · 398 So. 2d 1005 - Bruner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless concurrent sentences are involved, a defendant held on multiple charges arising from different jurisdictions is not entitled to overlapping credit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilder v. State“In some circumstances, a defendant may be entitled to presentence credit extending back to the filing of a detainer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.