¶1We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for burglary of a conveyance. However, our review of the record reveals that the defendant was never apprised of his right to contest the amount of the public defender’s lien that was imposed. This was error. Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Therefore, the $600 lien is stricken without prejudice to its reim-position upon compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with.this opinion.
632 So. 2d 99
Smith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 4, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-02-04
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1994
3 state decisions
Relies on Smith v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-02-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →