Campbell v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2013
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Cole · Minneapolis-Moline Company v. Purser · Tamburine v. Center Savings Ass'n · Wink v. Wink · Brown v. Cole
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where an agent is acting for the principal, the principal is liable for the agent’s fraud and misrepresentations within the scope of the agency, even though the principal had no knowledge of the fraud or misrepresentation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.