Kaynard v. Mego Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
633 F.2d 1026 · 1980
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Carpenters Local Union No of United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Pratt-Farnsworth Inc (1982), Miller National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center (1994)
32 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 5
Relies on International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Bornstein v. United States · McLeod v. General Electric Co. · Harold A. Boire Etc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Etc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may fully review its conclusions of law, including findings of reasonable cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that [granting] injunctive relief would be just and proper.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not abdicate review of these issues, particularly as it is very unlikely a Circuit Court will uphold those findings.” (Respondent Br. at 30). To support this proposition, Respondent cites decisions from the Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits, and criticizes the AU’s factual findings and credibility determinations. However, the Court follows the law of this Circuit and sustains the Regional Director's version of the facts when, as here, those”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.