United States v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis
633 F.2d 1184 · 1981
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
January 1992
most recently cited
27 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Santoni v. United States · Quercia v. United States · Bronston v. United States · United States v. California · Dioguardi v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] judge is not a mere moderator, and he has an obligation and duty to question witnesses and comment on the evidence when necessary.... In fact a trial judge may elicit facts not yet adduced or clarify those previously presented and he may maintain the pace of the trial by interrupting and curtailing counsel’s examinations as a matter of discretion.... Only when the judge’s conduct strays from neutrality is a defendant thereby denied a fair trial as required by the Constitution.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(o)nly when the judge's conduct strays from neutrality is a defendant thereby denied a fair trial as required by the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruiz v. Estelle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.