Gipson v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
633 F.2d 120 · 1980
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2008
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sheehan v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Copaken v. Secretary of Health Education and Welfare · Himmler v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Specifically, the Secretary's solicitation of a new application, in our view, constitutes an SSA promise that the defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel under 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.937(a) and 404.938a (1979) will not be asserted against Gipson should she file a new claim for SSA disability benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Sullivan“final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boock v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.