Jackson v. O'Bannon’s Empirical Analysis
633 F.2d 329 · 1980
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
May 1999
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Weinberger v. Salfi · Hagans v. Lavine · King v. Smith · Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The entire AFDC program relies on the integrity of the parent or custodian who is expected to disburse the child's grant in accordance with the statutory purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bray v. Dowling“the presumption involved is one of application of government benefits, not independent income or resources as was true in [King, Lewis, and Van Lare ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bray v. Dowling“(T)he irrebuttable presumption analysis is inapplicable to challenges to aspects of social welfare programs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.