Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 F.2d 477 - Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp.

Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

633 F.2d 477 · 1980

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co. (1984), Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co. (1981)

39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

400198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · United States v. Swift & Co. · Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... in its damage assessment the 'fact finder may act on probability and inference .... Even though we may not agree with each step in the (fact finders) reasoning process, we must affirm ... unless the findings are beyond the pale of sane judgment' (citation omitted).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(A) defendant whose wrongful conduct has rendered difficult the ascertainment of precise damages suffered by the plaintiff is not entitled to complain that they cannot be measured with the same exactness and precision as would otherwise be possible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(t)he favored method of ascertaining damage in antitrust litigation is to consider only that product line or market in which the plaintiff suffered injury rather than plaintiff's entire business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.