Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 F.2d 599 - Leonhard v. United States

Leonhard v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

633 F.2d 599 · 1980

Citation profile

322
cited by 322 later decisions
10
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

146 federal appellate · 15 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 322 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Cullen v. Margiotta (1987), Doe ex rel. Doe v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort Wayne (1986)

146 federal appellate · 15 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 10 states

160019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Monroe v. Pape

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 322 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of prejudice to the nonappealing party, this Court too has declined to dismiss premature notices of appeal where subsequent actions of the district court have imbued the order appealed from with finality.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “§ 2401. Time for commencing action against United States. (a) Except as provided by the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, every civil action commenced against the United States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues. The action of any person under legal disability or beyond the seas at the time the claim accrues may be commenced within three years after the disability ceases. (b) A tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[a] tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless, it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.