Mabus v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
633 F.3d 1356 · 2011
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 41 U.S.C. § 609
Relies on M. Steinthal & Co. v. Seamans · Ac Aukerman Company v. Rl Chaides Construction Co · Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington Inc v. United States · Honeywell, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Georgia-Pacific Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) misleading conduct, which may include not only statements and actions but silence and inaction, leading another to reasonably infer that rights will not be asserted against it; (2) reliance upon this conduct; and (3) due to this reliance, material prejudice if the delayed assertion of such rights is permitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.