Hoskins v. Dart’s Empirical Analysis
633 F.3d 541 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ball v. City of Chicago · Thomas v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Hindmon v. National-Ben Franklin Life Insurance · Newman v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority · Turley v. Gaetz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“three [prior] federal civil rights cases on similar claims , all of which he was still litigating .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Court relies on a party’s litigation history listed in his or her complaint to adhere to the three-strike requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g), and thus there is a need for reliable information about prior litigation. As a result, where a party fails to provide accurate litigation history, the Court may appropriately dismiss the action for providing fraudulent information to the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.