Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

633 F. App'x 587

Prentice v. Andrews

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2016

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2016-02-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2016-02-26

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Steven Dixon Prentice, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.*Prentice v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02062-BO, 2015 WL 4928953 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015; Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

¶5 To the extent Prentice challenges the amount collected by the Bureau of Prisons, he failed to show exhaustion of his administrative remedies.

/633/fappx/587 · .json · Public domain