Jarrett v. Headley’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Wainwright v. Sykes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appearing only on Jarrett's photograph. Id. at 1415-16. He further found it particularly significant that Ingraham had, after Hyland's selection of Kelly's and Jarrett's photos, told Hyland who they might be and where they were from, since these disclosures”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Jarrett v. Headley“surely one of the 'surrounding circumstances' that properly affect the court's evaluation of the appropriateness of what the police and prosecutors chose to do in obtaining the witness's in-court identification testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Jarrett v. Headley“the manner in which [the array] was handled contributed significantly to the process of suggestion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Jarrett v. Headley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.