Travis v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383C (§ 1634 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Heckler v. Campbell · Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity · Barefoot v. Estelle · Marcus v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the burden of going forward shifts to the Secretary to prove that there is available some other kind of 'substantial gainful employment’ that the claimant can perform, once he establishes that his impairment is of such severity that it precludes him from performing his former work”). . Dr. Abrams’ completion of the sheet entitled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.