Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 NE2D 250 - Buie v. State

Buie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Richardson v. State (1999), Holmes v. State (1996)

35 state decisions

290199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blockburger v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In determining whether a statement was voluntarily given, we look to all the circumstances surrounding its giving to determine whether it was “induced by any violence, threats, promises, or other improper influences.” The same test determines whether a waiver of the Miranda rights has occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If from the manner in which the offenses were actually charged it appears that one offense becomes a 'spe-cles of lesser-included offense, then double jeopardy principles bar conviction for both offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.