Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 NW2D 548 - Griffis v. Luban

Griffis v. Luban’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Calder v. Jones · Larson v. Dunn · 781 So. 2d 241 - Williams v. Skysite Communications Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conclud[ing] that Luban was subject to the Alabama court's jurisdiction because she made potentially defamatory statements that were being read in Alabama and had knowledge of the effect of those statements in Alabama.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.