Bell v. Vanlandingham’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1996
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Knop v. McCain · 613 So. 2d 348 - Roberts v. Hutchins · 628 So. 2d 510 - Wright v. Holy Name of Jesus Med. Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a doctor-patient relationship between a potential juror and a party to a *Page 165 lawsuit is prima facie evidence of probable prejudice on the part of the potential juror,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It continues to be the trial court's responsibility to determine whether that presumption can be overcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“can set aside her opinions and try the case fairly and impartially, according to the law and the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.