Aguiar v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 596 So. 2d 438 - Capuzzo v. State · 576 So. 2d 709 - State v. Gurican · 506 So. 2d 50 - Quarterman v. State · 114 Ill. App. 3d 984 - People v. Castro · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We disagree with the defendant’s argument that Capuzzo is distinguishable from the present case based upon the fact that the defendant in Capuzzo had actual notice of the sentencing hearing. In Capuzzo , the defendant had entered a plea, and a sentencing hearing was scheduled. The defendant failed to appear at the scheduled sentencing hearing. The specific issue addressed by the Court was whether a defendant could be sentenced in absentia, where the defendant voluntarily failed to attend a scheduled sentencing hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. J.D. v. State“defendants cannot be allowed to thwart or impede the judicial process through their own misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.