Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

633 So. 2d 578

Medina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-03-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2001

2 state decisions

Relies on 509 So. 2d 1115 - Ochoa v. State · 502 So. 2d 489 - Lewis v. State · 588 So. 2d 660 - Williams v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions. We also affirm his sentences for same except as to restitution.

¶2The trial court imposed restitution upon appellant pursuant to section 775.089, Florida Statutes (1991). However, there was no hearing on the matter, nor did the trial court mention restitution in its oral pronouncement of sentence. The parties agree that a hearing must be conducted before restitution may be imposed. Williams v. State, 588 So.2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also Snell v. State, 502 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 509 So.2d 1119 (Fla.1987). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of restitution and remand for a restitution hearing.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/633/so2d/578 · .json · Public domain