Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 SO2D 816 - State v. Brooks

State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 484 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fraser · State v. Fontenot · State v. Lee · 489 So. 2d 994 - State v. Jordan · 483 So. 2d 1223 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[djismissing .the appeal would simply result in a delay of the appellate process, and hinder defendant’s right to appeal.”); see also State v. Lampkin, 12-391, pp. 3-4 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/16/13), 119 So.3d 158, 162 , writ denied State ex rel. Lampkin v. State, 13-2303 (La.5/23/14), 140 So.3d 717 - (finding- that although”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.