Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 SW2D 253 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2007

10 state decisions

50198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Toliver · Harkins v. Lauf · State v. Smith · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there exists no authority for a Missouri court to order that a sentence imposed by it shall run concurrently with a sentence being served in another state or with a sentence being served in federal custody.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.