Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 633 SW2D 564 - Mena v. State

Mena v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Massiah v. United States · Estelle v. Smith · Brasfield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ Estelle v. Smith ] would indicate that use of psychiatrist's findings from interviewing and observing a juvenile in certification for criminal trial would be permissible without showing additional Miranda warnings as to such use.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.