Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 634 A2D 857 - Puleo v. Forgue

Puleo v. Forgue’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Veach v. Veach · Puleo v. Forgue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a)(1) The family court, upon miscellaneous petition of a grandparent for visitation rights with the petitioner's grandchild, and upon notice to both parents of the child, and after a hearing on the petition, may grant reasonable rights of visitation of the grandchild to the petitioner. "(2) The court, in order to grant the petitioner reasonable rights of visitation, must find and set forth in writing the following findings of fact: "(i) That it is in the best interest of the grandchild as determined on a case-by-case basis that the petitioner is granted visitation rights with the grandchild. * * * "(ii) That the petitioner is a fit and proper person to have visitation rights with the grandchild; "(iii) That the petitioner has repeatedly attempted to visit his or her grandchild during the thirty (30) days immediately preceding the date the petition was filed and was not allowed to visit the grandchild during the thirty-day (30) period as a direct result of the actions of either, or both, parents of the grandchild; "(iv) That there is no other way the petitioner is able to visit his or her grandchild without court intervention; and "(v) That the petitioner, by clear and convincing evidence, has successfully rebutted the presumption that the parent's decision to refuse the grandparent visitation with the grandchild was reasonable." 12”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the findings of a [hearing] justice will not be disturbed on appeal unless the [hearing] justice misconceived or overlooked material evidence or was otherwise clearly wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.