Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 634 F.2d 1245 - Frank v. Bloom

Frank v. Bloom’s Empirical Analysis

634 F.2d 1245 · 1980

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
5
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 10 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably United States v. Teague (1992), Burrow v. Arce (1999)

27 federal appellate · 10 district · 7 state decisions

280198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. · Davis v. Alaska · Pauling v. McElroy · Savings Bank v. Ward · United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact ... that the attorney in the heat of trial disregards the direction of the client as to trial strategy or activity does not give the client a right of action against the attorney. After all, it is the duty of the attorney who is a professional to determine trial strategy. If the client had the last word on this the client would be his or her own lawyer. Therefore, an attorney does not ordinarily violate his duty to the client by rejecting a client’s suggested tactics.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he factual matter contained in the pleadings is admissible as an admission by a party made by his agent acting within the scope of his employment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.