Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 634 F.2d 199 - Gregory v. Mitchell

Gregory v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

634 F.2d 199 · 1981

Citation profile

222
cited by 222 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

95 federal appellate · 14 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 222 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019 · most notably McNeil v. United States (1993), Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Investment Corp. (1981)

95 federal appellate · 14 district · 4 state decisions

9801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Foman v. Davis · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States · Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 222 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`due to oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a busy district court [from being] imposed upon by the presentation of theories seriatim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.