United States v. Dacus’s Empirical Analysis
634 F.2d 441 · 1980
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2013
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1701 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 1703 · 15 U.S.C. § 1717 · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · United States v. National Dairy Products Corp. · United States v. Murdock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(W)hether or not a statute is unconstitutionally vague must be assessed in the context of the particular conduct to which it is being applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.