Hurst v. Hantke’s Empirical Analysis
634 F.3d 409 · 2011
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo · Dillon v. Rogers · Dole v. Chandler · Bryant v. Rich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a remedy is not 'available' within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act to a person physically unable to pursue it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lanaghan v. Koch“a remedy is not available if the essential elements of the procedure for obtaining it are concealed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lanaghan v. Koch“secret supplement to the state's administrative code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lanaghan v. Koch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.