Morgan v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
634 F.3d 53 · 2011
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · United States v. Zannino · Malty v. Ashcroft · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]redibility determination is superfluous when the [applicant's] testimony, even if taken at face value, is insufficient to compel an entitlement to relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a claim for withholding of removal 'imposes a more stringent burden of proof on an alien than does a counterpart claim for asylum.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“rejecting a factual finding is inappropriate unless the record is such as to compel a reasonable factfinder to reach a different conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morris v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.