Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 634 F.3d 642 - Zherka v. Amicone

Zherka v. Amicone’s Empirical Analysis

634 F.3d 642 · 2011

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Rosenblatt v. Baer · Bloch v. Ribar · Liberman v. Gelstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Allegations of loss of business or some other tangible injury as a result of a defendant's [retaliatory] statements would suffice to establish concrete harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “private citizens claiming retaliation for their criticism of public officials have been required to show that they suffered an 'actual chill’ in their speech as a result.”); Gill v. Pidlypchak, 389 F.3d 379, 381 (2d Cir.2004) (line of cases in Second Circuit — involving criticism of public officials by private citizens —”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Second Circuit has described the elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim in several ways, depending on the factual context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.