Frick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2011
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Wade · Manson v. Brathwaite · Elkins v. United States · Kolod v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“argue[d] that the wiretapping evidence [sought to be admitted against him] would have been inadmissible had it been obtained in Oklahoma, and that therefore it should be inadmissible without regard to where it was obtained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres“seems to imply that wiretapping would be permissible under certain circumstances, there are no statutes providing for the granting of legal authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres“Virginia officers were in full compliance with Virginia law when they made the recording and therefore, were obtained with legal authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.