Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 634 SO2D 1123 - Semmer v. Johnson

Semmer v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 401 So. 2d 1310 - Binger v. King Pest Control · 584 So. 2d 587 - Office Depot, Inc. v. Miller · 144 So. 2d 341 - Bowen v. Manuel · Colonnell v. Mitchels

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “had the trial court afforded Semmer [the defendant] an opportunity to have his physician assess Cynthia's [the plaintiff] condition, or at least review the findings of Dr. Mandraccia's mid-trial examination, much of the prejudice occasioned by the surprise disclosure could have been avoided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “lawyers have a right to expect that once a trial commences, discovery and examinations must cease”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.