634 So. 2d 1168 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2014
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 422 So. 2d 123 - State v. Graham · 419 So. 2d 858 - State v. Raymo · 464 So. 2d 737 - State v. Perez · State v. Kelley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, as such officer or employee; or (2) Intentionally perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or (3) Knowingly permit any other public officer or public employee, under his authority, to intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, or to perform any such duty in an unlawful manner.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The duty must be expressly imposed by law upon the official because the official is entitled to know exactly what conduct is expected of him in his official capacity and what conduct will subject him to criminal charges.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A. Certified copies of books, records, papers or other documents of the state of Louisiana and its departments, boards, and agencies, and of its political subdivisions and their departments, boards, and agencies, and which are made self authenticating under Chapter 9 of the Louisiana Code of Evidence, shall be prima facie proof of the existence and contents of the originals and of any act, transactions or occurrence or event as a memorandum of which said books, records, papers or documents were kept or made. B. All courts of record in the state shall take judicial cognizance of the municipal ordinances and parochial ordinances which may be enacted by the governing authority of any town, city, municipality, or parish within their respective jurisdictions whenever certified copies of Imsuch ordinances have been •filed with the clerk of said court. The clerk shall.keep a record of such ordinances filed with him. It shall not be necessary to file more than one copy of any ordinance with the clerk in order that judicial cognizance be taken thereof.- Such certified copies may be filed with the various clerks of court either by the proper custodian of the ordinances of respective town', city, municipality or parish, or any lawful officer of the court. LSÁ-C.E. art. 202 states, in pertinent part: A. Mandatory. A court, whether requested to do so or not, shall take judicial notice of the laws of the United States, of every state, territory, and other jurisdiction of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Espejel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.